IFS Testing: A Technical Perspective for Implementation Success

IFS Cloud Testing Strategy: Technical Frameworks for Continuous Implementation Success

TL;DR: The Executive Summary

Testing is the only insurance policy for your ERP investment.

What it is: A multi-layered technical validation of IFS Cloud configuration, CRIMs, and data.
Phase 0 to Go-Live: Testing starts during Discovery, not after Build.

The Evergreen Factor: Testing must be a continuous cycle due to bi-annual IFS updates.
Problem Solved: Eliminates post-go-live «surprises,» data corruption, and operational downtime caused by untested customizations.

What Problem Does This Article Solve?

Many organizations treat ERP testing as a «check-the-box» activity before Go-Live. This leads to the «Iceberg Effect»: hidden defects in customizations (CRIMs), broken integration logic, and security permission gaps that only surface under real-world load. This article provides a structured framework to shift testing «left,» identifying risks in the Prototype phase to save 40% of implementation costs and ensuring your IFS Cloud environment remains stable during its continuous update cycles.

1. Discovery & The Technical Baseline

In the IFS methodology, testing begins long before the first environment is provisioned. During the Discovery & Planning phase, the focus is on creating a Testable Requirement Baseline.

Process Scoping

Using the IFS Scope Tool to define every business sub-process. If it isn’t in the scope, it won’t be in the test plan.

Enterprise Rules

Defining the «Book of Rules» (EBR). These rules become the «Expected Results» in your future test scripts.

Technical Baseline

Analyzing legacy data sources. Testing early data quality prevents «Garbage In, Garbage Out» in later phases.

2. Prototyping: Validating the «Possible»

The Confirm Prototype phase is where technical consultants build a «working model» of your future state. This isn’t just a demo; it’s the first stage of System Integration Testing (SIT).

The Anatomy of a Prototype Test

Unlike standard vanilla testing, an IFS Prototype Test uses Company-Specific Data. We validate:

Cross-Departmental Handshakes: Does a Shop Order correctly trigger a Purchase Requisition based on the prototype MRP settings?
IFS Projections: For IFS Cloud, we test the OData endpoints (Projections) to ensure the UI and API layers are communicating correctly.
Key User Training: Key users act as «First Pass» testers, documenting system navigation hurdles.

3. Building & The «CRIM» Validation

In the Establish Solution phase, customizations (Configurations, Reports, Integrations, Modifications — CRIMs) are fully developed. This is the most technically intensive testing period.

Manual vs. Automated Test Cycles

IFS Cloud implementations now demand a hybrid approach. While process logic often requires manual walkthroughs by SMEs, Regression Testing should be automated using the IFS Automated Testing Tool (ATT).

The CRIM Checklist:

Validating Page Configurations via the IFS Page Designer.
Testing Business Process Automation (BPA) workflows.
Ensuring Custom Events trigger the correct background jobs.

IFS Test Tracker

Centralizing defect management is non-negotiable. Every bug found during CRIM validation must be linked to a requirement ID, a developer, and a re-test cycle.

4. Cutover & Operational Readiness (ORT)

As you approach the Implement Solution phase, testing shifts from «Does it work?» to «Can the business run on it?». This involves Operational Readiness Testing (ORT).

Load & Stress Testing

Will the system freeze on Monday morning when 500 users log in simultaneously to record time? We simulate peak transactional volumes to validate the cloud-pod scaling and database performance.

Data Migration Rehearsal

Not a test of logic, but a test of timing. We run mock cutovers to ensure the «Go-Live Weekend» window is sufficient for the final legacy-to-cloud data sync.

The Evergreen Reality: 23R1, 24R1, 24R2…

In IFS Cloud, testing is never «finished.» The Evergreen model introduces bi-annual updates that change the underlying codebase.

Impact Analysis

Using the Update Analyzer to find conflicts between the new IFS release and your customizations.

Regression Automation

Maintaining a library of automated scripts to ensure core processes (P2P, O2C) don’t break during an update.

Periodic UAT

Engaging business owners every 6 months to validate new feature functionality before it hits production.

Frequently Asked Questions

While IFS tests the «Core» product rigorously, they cannot test your unique Configurations, Custom Fields, and Integrations. An update may change a standard projection that your external BI tool relies on, or a new security logic might block your custom «Shop Floor» page. You own the validation of your specific delta.

Technical Testers focus on the «plumbing»: APIs, data integrity, and script execution. Key Users focus on the «Process»: Does this workflow actually match how we sell to our customers? Key users perform UAT (User Acceptance Testing) to ensure the system is fit for business purpose.

For a standard implementation, we recommend at least three full mock runs. Mock 1 is for technical mapping, Mock 2 is for functional UAT, and Mock 3 is the «Cutover Rehearsal» to time the final Go-Live sequence.

A load test failure usually points to either unoptimized SQL in a CRIM, or a need to adjust the «pod» scaling in the IFS Cloud architecture. Identifying this *before* Go-Live allows the technical team to refactor code or increase resource allocation without impacting live customers.

Don’t Gamble with Your Go-Live

Our experts provide managed testing services, from automated regression scripts to complex SIT orchestration.

Get a Testing Audit